It is common practice among journalists inspired by political political agendas that they use facts or evidence incorrectly to fabricate or retain an officer who comes to a pre-determined conclusion. Now it seems that science has also become a new victim of his same strategy. To avoid responsibility for a global epidemic like Corona, the Chinese Communist Party aggressively campaigned among the scientists’ fraternity and the mainstream media that the disease was caused by natural diseases and came from animals to humans.
For example, China’s government-controlled CGTN Media Group reprinted an article on the corona virus of Paul Hayes with revisions. Paulie Hayes is a lecturer in the Department of Parasitology and Microbiology at Westminster University in England. The title of his article was, ‘Here’s how scientists know the corona virus came from bats and wasn’t made in lab’.
Both older and revised articles begin with this line: apparently SARS-CoV, which is responsible for the corona virus, gives no indication of genetic manipulation. He cites Hayes, if the virus was made in the lab through changes in genes, there would have been some indication of manipulation of genome data. It also includes the existing viral sequence as evidence for the basis of the new virus and it is clear that the genetic elements that were targeted (or deleted).
“But there is no evidence of this kind. It is very unusual that any technique used for genetic alteration in a virus does not leave any genetic signal such as specifically identifiable pieces of DNA code. ”
First of all, SARS-CoV-2 is an RNA virus, which means https: //www.rochester.edu/newscenter/covid-19-rna-coronavirus-research-4 … , Which does not occur in humans and other mammals, is encoded in genetic material RNA (RNA) for SARS-CoV-2, not in DNA. Additionally, identifying genetic hatch in viruses has always been a contentious issue. However, the persistence of poisoning in the media that the genetic tampering always leaves some signal reaches the level of an urban myth.
It is also important to note that the natural origin of SARS-CoV-2 has not been detected so far. Although its base is said to originate in bats, no intermediate nutrient animal has yet been identified. According to a recent report in the International Science General, the process of finding the natural origin of SARS-CoV-2, in progress or lack thereof, was reviewed.
According to this article, the bat corona virus RATG 13 and RmYN02 SARS-CoV-2, the two viruses that are closest to SARS-CoV-2, are still relatively distant, with 96 percent of the genome of SARS-CoV-2, respectively. And get up to 93 percent. Although RATG 13 resembles 96 percent of SARS-CoV-2, it is the receptor binding domain that allows the virus to bind by converting the enzyme-2 receptor (ACE2) to human angiotensin, and the structure is distinct and suggests. That RATG 13 cannot effectively bind human ACE2.
Nature’s news also does not suggest that only 61.3 per cent of the RBD of RmYN02 identifies with SARS-CoV-2, meaning that RmYN02 does not appear to bind to human cells. If none of the BAT corona virus binds to human cells effectively and many intermediate nutrients have not been found, then how SARS-CoV-2 caused human infection so intimately, even in early cases Me too?
Such “pre-compatibility” for human infectiousness and infectious elements can be easily explained through genetic manipulation. In 2015, Ralph Baric of the University of North Carolina and Zheng Li Xi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology jointly wrote a scientific article, in which RBD and SARS-CoV- of a newly isolated isolated corona virus (SHC014) Explained the combinatorial basis of 2.
A new novel virus came into existence through this experiment, the chimera SHC014-MA15, which showed a strong viral replication both in vitro and in vivo when testing human infectivity using an optimized model. A similar increase can be found in human infectivity and pathogenicity by replacing single amino acids with potential for profound clinical effects at multiple points, changes that may otherwise be indistinguishable from natural changes. Finally, the most characteristic sign of genetic manipulation of SARS-CoV-2 is the presence of a furin polybasic crack, a structure that is not present in any possible ancestor of the corona virus.
In fact, artificial removal of the furin polybasic cleavage site from SARS-CoV-2 does not affect human performance. This suggests that it is not required for this purpose, it is unlikely to appear positive during a natural evolutionary reaction. Techniques have been used for artificial mixing of such furin polybasic cleavage sites for 10 years.
Contrary to the ‘traditional intelligence’ of the scientist or media and the Chinese propaganda, there is ample evidence that the Kovid 19 epidemic corona virus is the result of genetic manipulation.
(Lawrence Sellin, PhD is a retired Colonel of the US Army. He has previously served in the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases and has also done basic and clinical research in the pharma industry. His e-mail ID Lawrence.firstname.lastname@example.org is)